The famous pic of Neil Armstrong planting the flag of U.S. flag on the moon's surfaceWhat?s wrong with this picture?

Foot print of Buzz Andrin
Again the various shadows indicate various directions of shadows falling. Meaning there were more than one sources of light as in a studio.Further more if the gravitational force on the moon is 1/6th of that on the earth, even a 500 pound man will not engrave such a deep footprint and clearly mark the pattern of his shoe print so clearly.

A heroic photograph
Just see that???? if there is no atmosphere on the moon then there should be no wind. Then how is it that the U.S. flag is clearly waving in both the pics.
Also as there is no atmosphere it should be clearer to see the outer space from the moon than from the earth.
Just way too many things wrong with this picture
(1) No stars in the sky.
(2) If you look in Armstrong?s visor you would see the reflection of the person taking photo
Take a look at his shadow?..it would make sense to think that the sun would be directly behind Armstrong (the main above pic not the reflection pic below)
Then how come it also appears that Armstrong?s body is receiving light form the right side as well. Notice how is Armstrong?s shoulder is much brighter than the left one.
The object marked with a ?C? is the camera placed on the chests of the astronauts.If this picture is really taken by the guy whom we had seen in the visor then that person would have been at least 7-7&1/2 feet tall, which none of the Apollo members were. It couldn?t be that the camera was pointed upwards for this picture because if you looked at the background it is obvious that the photo is taken on a declining angle. i.e. from an elevated position. And the reflection of the person who took the photo shows that he is standing perfectly straight and not on any kind of elevation such as a hill or a rock.

Reflection of the person taking photo.
Here?s a cool picture of an astronaut getting off the Lunar Lander.
Even on earth when someone on something is in a shadow its barely visible.
On the moon however there are no air molecules, which means that anything on the moon would be pitch-black. But yet in this picture, even though the man is purely in the shadow of Lunar Lander he is so nicely lit up that even his butt crease is visible.

The Lunar Lander behind the mysteriously waving U.S. flag has landing mechanism that forces 25000 pounds of upward thrust. They landed successfully and then took off from the surface with the same force.It seems odd that when such a massive force of heat and mass is generated directly on the moons surface no sort of any crater is formed beneath the Lunar Lander, but yet in the top picture the foot print of the man is so clearly engraved in the moons surface.
The lighting from the studio was NASA?s biggest give away of a hoaxArmstrong and Aldrin are almost of the same height.
Then why is it that Aldrin?s height is twice that of Armstrong?s?
The Conspiracy still remains??.who knows?????
What do you feel about it?
Publish your votes in the ballot-box and don't for get to give your comments.
src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">
23 comments:
this shit old and a total copy paste thing no stars fer this buddy as originality is the criteria fer me
hey apurv that post was meant for others who dint know abt. such a thing(at least with evidence)
The first thing is they have landed on the moon and I believe it............ Just think how could one dare to fool whole world didn't they care of their lives and careers......... they were Astronauts and not HOLLYWOOD actors............But jealous people always search for controverseries that's it!!!!!
And that too I've heard before.......that I researcher said it's not at all possible that one can land on moon b'coz there r storms roaming on every part of the moon and they never stop...
Huh....... But I'll never consider Armstrong & Buzz as actors they were great astronauts..............
And for your info nASA has answered most of the controversaries and so most of the posted there on your blog just doesn't exist........
hey blog abt ur views....dont copy-paste...
who r u ..........afraid of me ya!!!!
Though this is an old stuff, the reasoning of so many things is really praiseworthy. keep it up &
also visit my blog:
curious-abhi.blogspot.com
the story is true about lighting and stuff!
but there is more to it!
according to neil armstrong and co. saw alien spaceships!!!!
and the light was coming from it .
for further info talk to me in class! he he
Dear whatsyourname,
I would have wholly appreciated your article had it been clear wheather U ur self had found the evidence and proved the pix faulty.Did u do so?I guess not.
Sweet_razr(remember me?)...
NASA and AMERICA- You are the great cheaters. I dont believe that man stepped on moon.
I believe the controversies. they were not on the moon at this time however making the world think they were, gave them money for research to someday be or had. Now they are making believe other stuff. and they don't care who goes down Ex. 9/11. Be careful because God is coming to soon.
Great Study !
americans have not much knowledge about moon and still they are trying to find more and more evidence. why dont to go back to moon insearch of more evidence. that means they have never been to moon. they are f***** bull s**t. all they want is to call them "Big Brother" from rest of the world. kiss my A**
i do believe its a hoax for one thing, the best place to make things seems real during that time, was in hollywood.
I am not saying its wrong or wright
but my doubt is that if armstrong and aldrin could do that in the last 1960's why could'nt others do that in 2011 or before?
The proofs against the landing as shown by photos if not photoshopped, I agree with the logic.The explanation seems scientific.
if i'm nt mistake neil armstrong came outta module 1st then aldwin followed him after sometimes.then who took the big shot of him coming out of d module. Do you think he will hav tyme 2 set up the cam n run along and post himself climbin down the ladder.remember,they spend 2 and a half hours only on the moon.in which time,they did their jumpin around,experiments n pollin d flags n postin for photos
hahaha!!!
for 16 years, i believed that neil armstrong landed on the moon!
Quiz bees also asked, "who is the first man on the moon?" ,, books also printed that he is the first man on the moon... how dare you fool the world!
how dare you insult their pictures....... it is not totally the original pictures..... this is just the copy of the original pictures...... did you ever saw the moon personally and land on it...... don't mess with their success..... mess with your mother... go back where you from..... and delete this site
As humans, I believe we should question everything. When people stop questioning things, bad things can happen.
they fooled the whole world at that times in which people having a little knowledge...u cant continue it today...but whether it is real or not leave it aside. just ignore it coz it doesn't matter now. but, it stood as a backbone for the space researches in the entire world whether it is real or hypothetical....
my friend do read the wikipedia about this controversy u,ll get most of the doubts answered by NASA in a scientific and logical way....
despite of your shallow argument, they landed on the moon though. there have been so many clues proving that they have done it :)
Post a Comment